TLDR
- Musk said he funded OpenAI after assurances it would remain nonprofit.
- Musk contributed about $38 million to OpenAI from 2015 to 2017.
- OpenAI says Musk knew about plans for a for-profit structure.
- Musk is seeking $150 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft.
- The trial could affect OpenAI’s leadership and corporate structure.
Elon Musk told a federal court that he was a “fool” for helping fund OpenAI, as he testified in a civil trial over claims that the ChatGPT maker abandoned its founding nonprofit mission.
According to reports, Musk said he continued backing OpenAI after receiving assurances that the company would remain focused on developing artificial intelligence for public benefit. He alleged that OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, and President Greg Brockman later shifted the company toward a for-profit model.
The trial is taking place in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and is expected to last about four weeks. Musk is seeking damages and changes to OpenAI’s leadership and corporate structure.
Elon Musk Challenges OpenAI’s Direction
Musk contributed about $38 million to OpenAI between December 2015 and May 2017. He said he believed the company was being built as a nonprofit dedicated to human progress.
During testimony, Musk said his view of OpenAI changed over time, from early optimism to growing doubt and later a belief that the company had betrayed its original promise.
His lawsuit accuses OpenAI of prioritizing commercial growth after creating a for-profit entity in 2019. Musk has also cited Microsoft’s later investment as part of his concern that OpenAI moved away from its founding purpose.
OpenAI has rejected the allegations. The company argues that Musk knew about discussions around a for-profit structure and wanted greater control over the company before leaving its board in 2018.
Cross-Examination Turns Tense
OpenAI lawyer William Savitt questioned Musk about emails from 2015 and 2019, including messages discussing possible corporate structures and outside investment.
Musk pushed back on several questions, saying they were not simple and were designed to trick him. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers instructed him to answer more directly when possible.
Savitt pointed to communications suggesting Musk had considered for-profit structures or was aware of OpenAI’s plans to seek investment. Musk said discussions and brainstorming did not amount to a final agreement.
OpenAI’s lawyers have argued that the company needed private capital to pay for computing infrastructure and hire AI researchers. They also claim Musk’s lawsuit is intended to weaken OpenAI while supporting his competing AI venture, xAI.
Trial Could Affect OpenAI’s Future
The case carries major stakes for OpenAI, which has grown into one of the most valuable artificial intelligence companies in the world. The company has been preparing for a possible public offering that could give it a much higher valuation.
Musk is seeking $150 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft, with any award directed to OpenAI’s charitable arm. He also wants OpenAI returned to a nonprofit structure and has asked for Altman and Brockman to be removed from leadership roles.
OpenAI says Musk is motivated by control and competition, not concern over nonprofit principles. Musk says the company’s shift broke commitments made at its founding.
The trial will continue with further cross-examination. Jurors are expected to hear more evidence about OpenAI’s early agreements, internal communications, Microsoft’s investment, and the company’s transition from nonprofit research lab to commercial AI leader.
