TLDR
-
Mayor Adams unveils a Bitcoin-backed bond, but tax laws, BitLicense rules, and IRS hurdles threaten its viability.
-
Adams’s crypto bond plan clashes with federal and state laws, risking investor appeal and legal compliance.
-
NYC’s bold Bit Bond plan hits major resistance from the Comptroller and legal barriers around crypto-backed finance.
-
NYC’s first-ever Bitcoin muni bond faces uphill battles with tax rules, licensing, and lack of precedent.
-
Adams’s blockchain-driven bond plan collides with stiff opposition and complex tax, legal, and compliance issues.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams has launched a push to introduce the country’s first Bitcoin-backed municipal bond, dubbed Bit Bond. However, the proposal faces immediate opposition from New York City Comptroller Brad Lander and multiple regulatory challenges. While Adams envisions a financial tool tied to innovation, legal and tax frameworks pose significant barriers.
New York City Comptroller Brad Lander opposed Mayor Eric Adams’s proposed Bitcoin-backed municipal bond (Bitbond) plan, calling the idea “legally dubious and fiscally irresponsible.” He noted that under U.S. tax law, municipal bonds cannot be used to purchase cryptocurrencies or…
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) May 30, 2025
Under current U.S. tax laws, municipal bonds cannot fund cryptocurrency purchases or generate gains above federally subsidized interest rates. Additionally, New York State’s BitLicense requirements add costly and time-consuming compliance layers for any crypto activity. Moreover, federal securities regulations have no precedent for such digital asset-backed instruments.
If New York attempts to pay interest or principal in Bitcoin, each transaction would become a taxable event under IRS rules. That requirement could undermine the tax-exempt nature of municipal bonds and reduce investor appeal. As a result, traditional bond buyers may avoid such offerings unless the federal framework undergoes significant revision.
Mayor Adams Champions Blockchain Adoption Despite Opposition
Mayor Adams introduced the Bit Bond plan during the 2025 Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas, signaling a bold move toward digital finance. He presented Bitcoin as a cornerstone of future civic infrastructure, linking blockchain to public services like birth records and fines. His statements aimed to reverse the city’s past restrictions and attract crypto talent back to New York.
Adams criticized New York’s stringent crypto laws and called for eliminating the controversial BitLicense. He positioned himself as the “Bitcoin Mayor” and urged former blockchain businesses to return and help grow the city’s digital economy. The Mayor emphasized innovation as central to New York’s economic revival and future leadership.
The administration plans to explore using Bitcoin for tax payments and educational programs, despite lacking legal backing for those measures. Regulatory experts have warned that such moves would require approval from multiple federal and state agencies. However, Adams continues to press forward with the plan, highlighting the potential benefits of blockchain integration.
Regulators Push Back on Bit Bond Framework and Execution
Comptroller Brad Lander strongly opposes the Bit Bond initiative, labeling it legally uncertain and financially risky. He cited federal and state restrictions that prevent municipalities from holding or investing in cryptocurrencies. Without a federal exemption or updated guidelines, the bond could jeopardize the city’s financial credibility.
Lander also raised concerns about tax implications for investors who receive payouts in Bitcoin rather than dollars. According to the IRS, each crypto payment may trigger capital gains reporting, adding complexity to routine municipal bond investing. This structure could alienate institutional investors who rely on stable, low-risk instruments.
Furthermore, the lack of a tested legal structure makes it nearly impossible to issue the bond without creating new legislation. Regulators have not endorsed any framework for crypto-backed debt instruments at the municipal level. As a result, the project remains speculative and potentially difficult to implement without substantial legal changes.
