TLDR
- Banks revive GENIUS Act fight as Coinbase defends stablecoin rewards.
- Reward rules spark industry rift amid rising stablecoin competition.
- Armstrong rejects reopening law, warning changes risk innovation.
- Banking lobby faces pushback as platforms protect yield models.
- New crypto tax draft joins debate over payments and staking rules.
The stablecoin debate intensified as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong challenged renewed banking pressure on the GENIUS Act, and the pushback signaled a deeper industry divide. The clash emerged while lawmakers weighed new tax proposals for digital assets, and the dispute highlighted how stablecoin rules now shape competition. The development underscored mounting tensions as banks and crypto platforms defend their models.
Bank Push to Revise GENIUS Act Gains Momentum
Lawmakers received new appeals from banking groups seeking tighter limits on stablecoin reward programs, and the move revived policy battles settled months earlier. Banks urged Congress to restrict indirect yield mechanisms on platforms, and the effort sharply contrasted with the framework previously negotiated. Supporters of the current law argued that the GENIUS Act already prevents direct interest payments by issuers while still allowing platform-based rewards.
Industry analysts noted that banks earn significant returns on Federal Reserve balances, and the contrast with low consumer savings rates remained central to the dispute. Stablecoin platforms channel part of reserve-generated yields to users, and that model challenged long-standing banking revenue structures. Critics of bank lobbying said the campaign frames the issue as a safety concern while data shows no major deposit outflows from community banks.
The push to revise the law surfaced as the stablecoin market exceeded hundreds of billions in circulation, and its scale intensified the competitive stakes. Regulatory shifts now influence how platforms attract users, and reward restrictions could reshape product offerings. The renewed debate signaled that banks want greater control over yield distribution across digital financial systems.
Armstrong Rejects Any Attempt to Reopen the Law
Armstrong publicly opposed any effort to reopen the GENIUS Act, and his comments established a firm boundary for future negotiations. He argued that altering the reward provisions would weaken the compromise that enabled stablecoin innovation, and he maintained that platforms require clarity to expand adoption. His stance suggested that Coinbase views the reward model as essential to maintaining competitiveness.
Armstrong said banks may eventually support interest-bearing stablecoin features, and he implied that market demand will drive their shift. He stated that banks could seek access to stablecoin opportunities once they recognize their scale, and he emphasized that early resistance may prove short-lived. His assessment framed the lobbying effort as both counterproductive and misaligned with long-term financial trends.
The response also reinforced Coinbase’s position as a vocal defender of the existing regulatory framework, and the company signaled that it will resist any rollback. The remarks aligned with broader industry calls to preserve stablecoin reward flexibility, and platforms argued that restrictions would hinder user benefits. Observers noted that reopening the law could reintroduce uncertainty into a market seeking stable regulatory footing.
Lawmakers Advance New Tax Proposal for Digital Assets
Congress recently introduced a discussion draft seeking to ease tax burdens on everyday crypto activity, and the measure included stablecoin-specific provisions. The proposal would exempt small payments under a defined threshold from capital gains recognition and it aimed to streamline routine transactions. Supporters said the change could expand practical payment use.
The draft addressed long-standing concerns around staking and mining income, and it introduced a deferral window for reward recognition. Policymakers argued that the update would modernize tax treatment across digital asset activities and the measure gained early bipartisan attention. Analysts noted that the bill reflects growing congressional interest in integrating digital assets into mainstream financial systems.
The tax proposal emerged alongside the dispute over stablecoin rewards, and the combined developments showed how regulatory changes continue to shape the sector. Lawmakers balanced consumer protections with innovation goals, and the stablecoin debate illustrated the difficulty of maintaining that balance. The coming months may determine whether Congress adjusts current laws or preserves the framework that platforms now rely on.
