TLDR
- XRP traders are divided over whether XRP ETFs are causing a supply shortage on exchanges.
- A viral post claimed that only 1.5 billion XRP remains on exchanges due to recent ETF activity.
- Validator Vet responded by stating that 16 billion XRP is still held across major centralized exchanges.
- Vet explained that XRP supply is dynamic because tokens can move to exchanges within seconds.
- Some traders believe escrow rules and institutional custody could reduce effective XRP supply.
A growing divide has emerged among XRP traders over the impact of XRP ETF activity on exchange liquidity. Some traders argue supply is tightening, while others present higher exchange-held XRP figures. Disagreements center on the accuracy of on-chain data and potential effects on market price.
XRP ETF Supply Concerns Trigger Disputes
A post on X dated Dec. 27 claimed only 1.5 billion XRP remain on exchanges. The account unknowDLT linked this to XRP ETF inflows and warned of a possible “supply shock.” It estimated that around 750 million XRP had moved off exchanges in recent weeks.
The post projected a liquidity crunch by 2026 under the proposed “Clarity Act” legislation. This claim quickly circulated across XRP trading communities, triggering heated reactions. Some traders began speculating about XRP ETF-driven market effects.
However, not all participants agreed with the forecast. A validator on XRP Ledger, named Vet, responded with counter data. Vet said exchanges hold nearly 16 billion XRP, far higher than the viral claim.
Validators Defend High Liquidity Data
Vet published updated figures on Dec. 28 disputing the 1.5 billion XRP claim. “Markets are too dynamic to statically plot movements,” the validator stated in their post. They emphasized the fluid nature of XRP supply due to fast token transfers.
According to Vet, XRP holders can move funds to exchanges in three to four seconds. They argued this makes the market less vulnerable to long-term imbalances. Vet described the viral post’s projection as misleading.
They also highlighted differences in wallet tracking methodology. Vet shared that Upbit alone holds around 2 billion XRP across four known wallets. However, they said those represent only part of the actual holdings.
Traders Debate Custody and Escrow Mechanics
Trader Dman argued the effective circulating supply could tighten from escrow and custody rules. They suggested XRP ETF accumulation is happening in dedicated wallets. Dman said these holdings now account for around 1% of total XRP supply.
They further stated that Ripple’s monthly escrow releases could impact available liquidity. This could slowly reduce tradeable XRP over time. Some interpreted this as indirect support for the supply shock idea.
In response, Vet acknowledged Ripple facilitates ETF transfers but rejected panic-based conclusions. They reiterated that steady buying does not constitute a true supply crisis. Vet asserted only immediate allocation shifts would create shocks.
On-Chain Metrics Continue Fueling Debate
Validator Vet confirmed that XRP ETF activity is reflected in Ripple reports. However, they insisted billions of XRP remain available in Ripple operational wallets. These reserves could cover surging demand if needed.
Critics still question whether exchange-held balances are overstated due to wallet misclassification. Commentator Zach Rector voiced doubts over the accuracy of some exchange balance figures. Vet maintained the shared data was conservative.
As the debate grows, traders continue monitoring XRP ETF flows and wallet data. The XRP Ledger’s open nature allows real-time analysis of large transfers. Market watchers remain divided on the outcome.
The argument underscores the difficulty of interpreting dynamic on-chain activity. Different methods produce vastly different views of available XRP. This has created friction across the trading community.
