TLDR
- Andrew Tate’s wallets received $1.2 million from a Texas investment fraud case.
- Over $30 million funneled through Railgun privacy pool linked to Tate’s entities.
- Tate allegedly used privacy tools to obscure crypto transactions across networks.
- Blockchain data suggests Tate manipulated market sentiment in token promotions.
A report from on-chain investigator Specter alleges that crypto wallets connected to Andrew Tate are involved in a complex money laundering operation. These wallets are reportedly linked to significant illicit financial activities, including a $5 million investment scam in Texas.
According to the investigation, $1.2 million of the stolen funds from the fraud case were funneled through Tate’s crypto wallets. Additionally, Tate’s entities reportedly moved a total of $30 million through the Railgun privacy protocol, raising further concerns about potential illicit financial practices.
Tate’s Wallets Connected to $1.2 Million Fraud Case
Specter’s investigation traces blockchain activity connecting Andrew Tate’s crypto wallets to funds involved in a Texas-based investment scam. The report highlights a transfer of $1.2 million from wallets associated with the fraud to a wallet identified as “0x9B67.” This particular wallet is said to be linked to Tate based on blockchain activity, including a small transfer of funds from Tate’s known address.
The Texas lawsuit, which targets a $5 million scam, involves multiple crypto wallets used by the defendants to launder stolen funds. According to court documents, these wallets were used between January 2023 and February 2025 to carry out fraudulent activities. Specter’s findings show that some of these illicit funds were traced back to addresses linked to Tate, potentially implicating him in the fraud.
While Tate is not named as a defendant in the ongoing Texas lawsuit, these blockchain links could expose him to future legal actions. The U.S. authorities may pursue civil forfeiture actions to seize the funds involved in the scam, which could complicate Tate’s existing legal troubles in Europe.
Large-Scale Use of Privacy Protocols to Obscure Fund Movement
In addition to the fraud case connections, Specter claims that entities associated with Tate have routed large sums of money through Railgun, a privacy protocol designed to anonymize transactions. Over the past two years, $30 million was allegedly funneled through Railgun by Tate-linked wallets. Most of these funds came from Radom Pay, a crypto payment processor.
Andrew Tate (@Cobratate ) may allegedly be involved in money laundering activity.
Wallets linked to him have deposited up to $30M into Railgun over the past two years and have also been linked to a pig-butchering scam case.
On June 9, 2024, Andrew Tate posted a DM screenshot… pic.twitter.com/MDZyNzP56K
— Specter (@SpecterAnalyst) December 27, 2025
The use of high-volume privacy tools raises concerns among compliance officers, especially since Tate is under active legal scrutiny. Privacy protocols are often used to obscure the origins and destinations of funds, and their extensive use by indicted individuals is frequently flagged as a method to layer funds in an attempt to hide illicit activity.
Market Manipulation Through Public Statements
In another aspect of the investigation, Specter suggests that Tate may have engaged in market manipulation. In June 2024, Tate shared a screenshot on social media claiming to have rejected an offer to promote a token. However, blockchain data reveals that the wallet shown in the screenshot was funded by Tate’s own accounts, indicating that he controlled the wallet in question.
This suggests that Tate may have staged the rejection of the token promotion to maintain a public image of integrity, while still managing the wallet’s assets behind the scenes. Such actions could have been intended to manipulate market sentiment, further raising questions about the ethical conduct of Tate’s crypto activities.
As of now, Andrew Tate has not responded to these allegations. His involvement in this ongoing investigation remains unclear, but the trail of funds linked to his wallets could have significant legal consequences.
